ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Progression of Atrophy as a Function of ABCA4 Variants and Age of Onset in Stargardt Disease.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comparison of Randomizing Either One Eye or Both Eyes in Clinical Trials for Stargardt Disease Type 1.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Stargardt's Disease: Molecular Pathogenesis and Current Therapeutic Landscape.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Impact of Dietary Antioxidant Supplements on Atrophic Lesion Progression in Stargardt Disease: A Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the natural course of the retinal atrophy growth rate in patients with Stargardt disease (STGD1) with particular mutations in ABCA4, which may be eligible for mutation-specific therapy. Methods: Fundus autofluorescence images (Heidelberg Spectralis) were gathered from 221 patients (436 eyes) in two centers: Radboud UMC and Ghent University Hospital. The area of definitely decreased autofluorescence and total decreased autofluorescence was measured using the Heidelberg RegionFinder software tool. Square root transformation was used to correct for two-dimensional growth. A mixed model was used to determine the atrophy growth rates. Atrophy growth rates were calculated for all eyes and were categorized into subgroups based on ABCA4 mutations potentially suitable for mutation-specific therapy (c.4539+2001G>A; c.5461-10T>C; c.5882G>A; c.768G>T), or subgroups based on age of onset. Results: The mean square root-transformed growth rate of atrophy was 0.1446 mm/year (95% CI, 0.1382-0.1510 mm/year) for definitely decreased autofluorescence and 0.1459 mm/year (95% CI, 0.1402-0.1515 mm/year) for total decreased autofluorescence. Definitely decreased autofluorescence square root-transformed atrophy growth was slower in patients heterozygous for c.5882G>A (0.0821 mm/year) and c.4539+2001G>A (0.0686 mm/year) than c.768G>T (0.1299 mm/year) and c.5461-10T>C (0.1565 mm/year). Eyes of patients with late-onset STGD1 had the fastest atrophy growth (0.1782 mm/year), compared with eyes of patients with early-onset STGD1 (0.1655 mm/year) and patients with intermediate-onset STGD1 (0.1269 mm/year). Conclusions: Atrophy growth rates vary among subgroups of patients with STGD1, depending on both specific mutations and age of onset. This pattern may have implications for the design of clinical trials for mutation-specific therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.