ArticleSleep2025
Towards proactively improving sleep: machine learning and wearable device data forecast sleep efficiency 4-8 hours before sleep onset.
Article in Sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive Modeling of Preoperative Sleep Disorder Risk in Older Adults by Using Data From Wearable Monitoring Devices: Prospective Cohort Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Sleep-inducing algorithms: can artificial intelligence help shiftworkers and those working nonstandard hours sleep better?Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wearable devices with sleep-tracking functionalities can prompt behavioral changes to promote sleep, but proactively preventing poor sleep when it is likely to occur remains a challenge due to a lack of prediction models that can forecast sleep parameters prior to sleep onset. We developed models that forecast low sleep efficiency 4 and 8 hours prior to sleep onset using gradient boosting (CatBoost) and deep learning (Convolutional Neural Network Long Short-Term Memory, CNN-LSTM) algorithms trained exclusively on accelerometer data from 80,811 adults in the UK Biobank. Associations of various sleep and activity parameters with sleep efficiency were further examined. During repeated cross-validation, both CatBoost and CNN-LSTM exhibited excellent predictive performance (median AUCs > 0.90, median AUPRCs > 0.79). U-shaped relationships were observed between total activity within 4 and 8 hours of sleep onset and low sleep efficiency. Functional data analyses revealed higher activity 6-8 hours prior to sleep onset had negligible associations with sleep efficiency. Higher activity 4-6 hours prior had moderate beneficial associations, while higher activity within 4 hours had detrimental associations. Additional analyses showed that increased variability in sleep duration, efficiency, onset timing, and offset timing over the preceding 4 days was associated with lower sleep efficiency. Our study represents a first step towards wearable-based machine learning systems that proactively prevent poor sleep by demonstrating that sleep efficiency can be accurately forecasted prior to bedtime and by identifying pre-bed activity targets for subsequent intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40293116What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.