ReviewACR open rheumatology2025
Patient-Reported Factors Influencing Clinical Trial Participation: An In-depth Analysis of Patients With Lupus and Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Review in ACR open rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Group-Based Medical Mistrust and Logistical Factors Influencing Rheumatology Clinical Trial Enrollment: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Survey.ACR open rheumatology · 2026Article
- Exploring the Perspectives of Patients and Healthcare Providers on Rheumatology Clinical Trials: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study in Hungary.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical trials in rheumatology: patient motivations and concerns as key determinants of recruitment.Reumatologia · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a chronic systemic autoimmune disease, has only three approved therapies, despite a rapidly expanding number of clinical trials. Trials in SLE struggle to recruit patients and fail to fully enroll. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), another chronic autoimmune disease, has had more success in clinical trial enrollment. This article's goal is to analyze literature to compare patient perspectives on factors determining clinical trial participation in SLE and RA populations. A literature review regarding patient attitudes, perceptions, perspectives about, and barriers toward clinical trials was conducted. RA literature used more quantitative methods, whereas SLE literature used more qualitative methods. Literature revealed that patients with SLE and patients with RA reported similar factors motivating trial participation, such as altruism, personal benefit, and trust in physician, but patients with SLE were uniquely motivated by strong social networks. In terms of disadvantages to trial participation, patients with SLE and RA similarly reported fear of unknown interventions, complications, and side effects; only in the population of patients with SLE were fears of a disease flare and of not qualifying reported. SLE literature had a specific emphasis on factors influencing Black patient participation. This review informs steps for future research to better evaluate perceptions of clinical trials in patients with SLE and provides a framework for methods to increase SLE trial participation, including recognizing fear of changing treatment regimen as an explanation for the paucity of SLE trial participation, incorporating clinical trials as usual care for patients with SLE, and using less stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria for trials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.