ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
New Method of Impact Localization on Plate-like Structures Using Deep Learning and Wavelet Transform.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fatigue Crack Length Estimation Using Acoustic Emissions Technique-Based Convolutional Neural Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a new methodology for localizing impact events on plate-like structures using a proposed two-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) and received impact signals. A network of four piezoelectric wafer active sensors (PWAS) was installed on the tested plate to acquire impact signals. These signals consisted of reflection waves that provided valuable information about impact events. In this methodology, each of the received signals was divided into several equal segments. Then, a wavelet transform (WT)-based time-frequency analysis was used for processing each segment signal. The generated WT diagrams of these segments' signals were cropped and resized using MATLAB code to be used as input image datasets to train, validate, and test the proposed CNN model. Two scenarios were adopted from PAWS transducers. First, two sensors were positioned in two corners of the plate, while, in the second scenario, four sensors were used to monitor and collect the signals. Eight datasets were collected and reshaped from these two scenarios. These datasets presented the signals of two, three, four, and five impacts. The model's performance was evaluated using four metrics: confusion matrix, accuracy, precision, and F1 score. The proposed model demonstrated exceptional performance by accurately localizing all of the impact points of the first scenario and 99% of the second scenario. The main limitation of the proposed model is how to differentiate the data samples that have similar features. From our point of view, the similarity challenge arose from two factors: the segmentation interval and the impact distance. First, applying the segmenting procedure to the PWAS signals led to an increase in the number of data samples. The procedure segmented each PWAS signal to 30 samples with equal intervals, regardless of the features of the signal. Segmenting and transforming different PWAS signals into image-based data points led to data samples that had similar features. Second, some of the impacts had a close distance to the PWAS sensors, which resulted in similar segmented signals. Therefore, the second scenario was more challenging for the proposed model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.