ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Functional Signature of Decision Making Across Dyads During a Persuasive Scenario: Hemodynamic fNIRS Coherence Measure.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decision-Making Styles Shaping College Students' Sports and Health Consumption Preferences: Behavioral and Neurological Evidence.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advances in (Bio)Sensors for Physiological Monitoring: A Special Issue Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From the lab to the real world: emotions serving morality in dyadic negotiation.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Frontal Delta Dissimilarity During Moral Persuasion: Insight from an EEG Hyperscanning Study.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWithin a shared decision-making process, persuasion dynamics develop as a communication sub-process that can be characterized by different phases. This study examines hemodynamic functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) coherence measures in dyads of decision-makers. The interaction occurs in two phases: Phase 1, where the persuader (Pr) introduces the decision topic and uses persuasive strategies, and Phase 2, where the Persuaded (Pd) responds and may agree with the Pr's selected option.
methodFourteen dyads participated, with fNIRS measuring oxygenated (O
resultsPhase 2 showed increased HHb dissimilarity, indicating greater divergence in brain activity during the Pd's response phase. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that, during persuasion, when Pd responds, there is increased dissimilarity in cognitive and neural processes, without implying a loss of synergy. The study highlights the importance of interactional dynamics in shaping decision outcomes and underscores the potential of fNIRS as a non-invasive tool for monitoring brain activity in clinical and collaborative settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.