ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Development and In-Field Validation of an Autonomous Soil Mechanical Resistance Sensor.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soil compaction is a widespread problem, leading to soil degradation, yield losses, and adverse environmental impacts. Nowadays, various measurement methods exist to assess and map soil compaction, with vertical cone penetration resistance measurements being one of the most commonly used. This method is easy, rapid, inexpensive, and generally accepted. However, manual penetration resistance measurements are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and often less accurate due to inconsistent penetration speed. To address these limitations, an automated penetrometer was developed and integrated on an autonomous robot platform, paving the way for high-resolution compaction mapping as a starting point for precision subsoiling to remediate soil compaction. The performance of this setup was validated in controlled and field conditions against a hand-held penetrometer. Therefore, experiments were conducted in soil-filled cylinders and on plots of a long-term field experiment, including measurements across spraying tracks. The automated penetrometer demonstrated high correlations with the hand-held device under controlled conditions, though the correlation was somewhat lower in the field due to the soil's heterogeneity. Deviations between the two measurement devices were likely caused by the inconsistent insertion speed of the hand-held penetrometer, particularly in soils with high penetration resistance. Both penetrometers successfully identified the plow pan at a depth of 30-40 cm but were unable to clearly show the effect of the long-term presence of spraying tracks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.