ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Revitalizing Astronomical Azimuth Determination: Integrating Modern Computing with Traditional Techniques.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is not widely recognized today that astronomical methods for azimuth determination continue to rank among the most accurate techniques for establishing orientation. However, their importance has diminished with the rise of GNSS techniques, which do not require clear skies and work in various weather conditions. Unlike GNSSs, astronomical methods rely on clear visibility and involve calculations based on spherical trigonometry. This work aims to simplify these calculations by providing open-source Python scripts that automate the process. These scripts also simulate the achievable precision, allowing users to plan optimal observations in advance. One of the aims of this work is to demonstrate that, in certain cases, the integration of 'contemporary' tools with techniques now regarded as 'outdated' can produce very accurate results. Beyond their purely historical significance, which has profoundly influenced modern surveying methods, the integration of astronomical measurements with modern computing codes allows surveyors to achieve azimuths with an accuracy of ±1-2 arcseconds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.