ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Enhancing EEG-Based Emotion Detection with Hybrid Models: Insights from DEAP Dataset Applications.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subject Identity Confounds qEEG Emotion Recognition on DEAP and DREAMER.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- On the prediction models for brain signal-based emotion recognition.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Transparent EEG Analysis: Leveraging Autoencoders, Bi-LSTMs, and SHAP for Improved Neurodegenerative Diseases Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emotion detection using electroencephalogram (EEG) signals is a rapidly evolving field with significant applications in mental health diagnostics, affective computing, and human-computer interaction. However, existing approaches often face challenges related to accuracy, interpretability, and real-time feasibility. This study leverages the DEAP dataset to explore and evaluate various machine learning and deep learning techniques for emotion recognition, aiming to address these challenges. To ensure reproducibility, we have made our code publicly available. Extensive experimentation was conducted using K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM), Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), autoencoders, and transformers. Our hybrid approach achieved a peak accuracy of 85-95%, demonstrating the potential of advanced neural architectures in decoding emotional states from EEG signals. While this accuracy is slightly lower than some state-of-the-art methods, our approach offers advantages in computational efficiency and real-time applicability, making it suitable for practical deployment. Furthermore, we employed SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to enhance model interpretability, offering deeper insights into the contribution of individual features to classification decisions. A comparative analysis with existing methods highlights the novelty and advantages of our approach, particularly in terms of accuracy, interpretability, and computational efficiency. A key contribution of this study is the development of a real-time emotion detection system, which enables instantaneous classification of emotional states from EEG signals. We provide a detailed analysis of its computational efficiency and compare it with existing methods, demonstrating its feasibility for real-world applications. Our findings highlight the effectiveness of hybrid deep learning models in improving accuracy, interpretability, and real-time processing capabilities. These contributions have significant implications for applications in neurofeedback, mental health monitoring, and affective computing. Future work will focus on expanding the dataset, testing the system on a larger and more diverse participant pool, and further optimizing the system for broader clinical and industrial applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.