ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Method to Calibrate Angular Positioning Errors Using a Laser Tracker and a Plane Mirror.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early Hidden-Crack Detection in Circular Magnetic Encoder Rings Through FM-AM Signal Decoupling.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We describe a method to calibrate angular positioning errors of a rotation stage using a laser tracker (LT), a plane mirror mounted on the stage, and stationary registration nests placed around the stage. Our technique involves determining the direction of the normal vector to the plane of the mirror at each angular step by performing two LT measurements-one directly to a stationary spherically mounted retroreflector (SMR), and another to the same SMR by bouncing the laser off a mirror mounted on the rotation stage. Because the angular range that can be measured from a single LT station is limited by the angle of incidence on the mirror, multiple LT stations are necessary to cover the full 360°, hence the need for stationary registration nests to tie the LT data into a common coordinate frame. We compare this technique against a direct approach involving a rigid bar with two SMRs mounted on the rotation stage so that we can measure the direction of the line joining the SMRs at each angular position using the LT and, therefore, the angle between positions. Through experiments, we demonstrate that our mirror-based approach provides errors on the order of ±0.5″, smaller than the ±1.5″ for the direct approach, when compared against a reference instrument with accuracy better than 0.3″. Through simulations, we estimate the uncertainty in our mirror-based angle measurements to be 0.4″ (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.