Trial reportSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Early Findings on the Effectiveness of Novel Awakening Stimuli for Patients with Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome.
Trial report in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Congenital Central Hypoventilation Syndrome (CCHS) is a rare disorder that impairs autonomic breathing control, leading to alveolar hypoventilation and sometimes to central apnoea, predominantly during sleep. Patients typically require nocturnal ventilatory support and alarms to prevent life-threatening desaturation events. However, current alarm systems integrated into pulse oximeters do not provide adequate assistance at home. To address these limitations, we developed an assistive device with customizable multisensory stimulation that activates based on the severity and duration of desaturation episodes. In a multicenter clinical trial involving 4 children and 11 young adults with CCHS, we assessed the device's effectiveness and the role of arousals over three nights: one baseline and two test nights. The results showed that the device significantly improved awakening rates and enabled faster recovery from desaturations in young adults. However, no such improvements were observed in children compared to the baseline. Arousal events and sleep efficiency were unaffected by the device in both groups. These findings suggest that the device can enhance the safety and autonomy of young adults with CCHS but may be more effective in alerting caregivers in pediatric cases than directly waking children. Further studies are needed to refine its application across different age groups, given the limited sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.