Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40292880›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Robust Adversarial Example Detection Algorithm Based on High-Level Feature Differences.

Hua Mu, Chenggang Li, Anjie Peng, Yangyang Wang, Zhenyu Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hua MuCollege of Electronic Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei 230037, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2710-8850
Chenggang LiThe First People's Hospital of Guangyuan, Guangyuan 628017, China.
Anjie PengJianghuai Advanced Technology Center, Jianghuai 230031, China.
Yangyang WangCollege of Electronic Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei 230037, China.ORCID 0009-0003-7581-9897
Zhenyu LiangCollege of Electronic Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Hefei 230037, China.

Funding

Hefei Comprehensive National Science Center,the Scientific Research Project of National University of Defense Technology Grant 22-ZZCX-07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The threat posed by adversarial examples (AEs) to deep learning applications has garnered significant attention from the academic community. In response, various defense strategies have been proposed, including adversarial example detection. A range of detection algorithms has been developed to differentiate between benign samples and adversarial examples. However, the detection accuracy of these algorithms is significantly influenced by the characteristics of the adversarial attacks, such as attack type and intensity. Furthermore, the impact of image preprocessing on detection robustness-a common step before adversarial example generation-has been largely overlooked in prior research. To address these challenges, this paper introduces a novel adversarial example detection algorithm based on high-level feature differences (HFDs), which is specifically designed to improve robustness against both attacks and preprocessing operations. For each test image, a counterpart image with the same predicted label is randomly selected from the training dataset. The high-level features of both images are extracted using an encoder and compared through a similarity measurement model. If the feature similarity is low, the test image is classified as an adversarial example. The proposed method was evaluated for detection accuracy against four comparison methods, showing significant improvements over FS, DF, and MD, with a performance comparable to ESRM. Therefore, the subsequent robustness experiments focused exclusively on ESRM. Our results demonstrate that the proposed method exhibits superior robustness against preprocessing operations, such as downsampling and common corruptions, applied by attackers before generating adversarial examples. It is also applicable to various target models. By exploiting semantic conflicts in high-level features between clean and adversarial examples with the same predicted label, the method achieves high detection accuracy across diverse attack types while maintaining resilience to preprocessing, providing a valuable new perspective in the design of adversarial example detection algorithms.

Indexed as

adversarial example detectionfeature differencesfeature encoderrobustnesssimilarity measurement model

Identifiers

PMID40292880
PMCPMC11946526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.