Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40292873›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Evaluation of Data Acquisition Areas in Geotechnical Seismic Tests: Insights from Field Applications.

Gunwoong Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gunwoong KimDepartment of Geotechnical Engineering Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Goyang 10223, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9356-7174

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geotechnical field testing evaluates soil, rock, and groundwater conditions in their natural states, offering critical information about subsurface properties such as the density, strength, permeability, and groundwater flow. These tests are essential in ensuring the safety, reliability, and performance of civil engineering projects and are increasingly used for 3D geographical visualization and subsurface modeling. While point-based tests like the cone penetration test (CPT) and standard penetration test (SPT) are widely used, area-based methods such as the spectral analysis of surface waves (SASW) and electrical resistivity testing significantly enhance the accuracy of such models by providing broader coverage. Furthermore, these non-destructive techniques are particularly effective in identifying subsurface defects. This study focuses on analyzing the data acquisition areas of various field seismic tests, including SASW, downhole, crosshole, and suspension logging (PS logging). While other tests clearly define data acquisition areas based on their array paths, the SASW test posed challenges due to the complexity of data reconstruction. To address this, 69 datasets from four different sites were analyzed to predict the data acquisition areas for SASW as a function of depth. Moreover, a case study demonstrates the practical application of the SASW method in detecting cavities near a dam spillway. The findings of this research improve the understanding and interpretation of geotechnical seismic test data, enabling more precise geotechnical investigations and advancing the detection of subsurface defects using non-destructive methods.

Indexed as

data acquisitiongeophysical testingnon-destructive testingseismic testingsub-surface informationVs profile

Identifiers

PMID40292873
PMCPMC11946366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.