ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Evaluation of Data Acquisition Areas in Geotechnical Seismic Tests: Insights from Field Applications.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Geotechnical field testing evaluates soil, rock, and groundwater conditions in their natural states, offering critical information about subsurface properties such as the density, strength, permeability, and groundwater flow. These tests are essential in ensuring the safety, reliability, and performance of civil engineering projects and are increasingly used for 3D geographical visualization and subsurface modeling. While point-based tests like the cone penetration test (CPT) and standard penetration test (SPT) are widely used, area-based methods such as the spectral analysis of surface waves (SASW) and electrical resistivity testing significantly enhance the accuracy of such models by providing broader coverage. Furthermore, these non-destructive techniques are particularly effective in identifying subsurface defects. This study focuses on analyzing the data acquisition areas of various field seismic tests, including SASW, downhole, crosshole, and suspension logging (PS logging). While other tests clearly define data acquisition areas based on their array paths, the SASW test posed challenges due to the complexity of data reconstruction. To address this, 69 datasets from four different sites were analyzed to predict the data acquisition areas for SASW as a function of depth. Moreover, a case study demonstrates the practical application of the SASW method in detecting cavities near a dam spillway. The findings of this research improve the understanding and interpretation of geotechnical seismic test data, enabling more precise geotechnical investigations and advancing the detection of subsurface defects using non-destructive methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.