ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Fault Types and Diagnostic Methods of Manipulator Robots: A Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sensorless Payload Estimation in an Industrial Robot Using Internal Motor-Current Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Manipulator robots hold significant importance for the development of intelligent manufacturing and industrial transformation. Manufacturers and users are increasingly focusing on fault diagnosis for manipulator robots. The voltage, current, speed, torque, and vibration signals of manipulator robots are often used to explore the fault characteristics from a frequency perspective, and temperature and sound are also used to represent the fault information of manipulator robots from different perspectives. Technically, manipulator robot fault diagnosis involving human intervention is gradually being replaced by new technologies, such as expert experience, artificial intelligence, and digital twin methods. Previous reviews have tended to focus on a single type of fault, such as analysis of reducers or joint bearings, which has led to a lack of comprehensive summary of various methods for manipulator robot fault diagnosis. Considering the needs of future research, a review of different fault types and diagnostic methods of manipulator robots provides readers with a clearer reading experience and reveals potential challenges and opportunities. Such a review helps new researchers entering the field avoid duplicating past work and provides a comprehensive overview, guiding and encouraging readers to commit to enhancing the effectiveness and practicality of manipulator robot fault diagnosis technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.