ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Hand Gesture Recognition on Edge Devices: Sensor Technologies, Algorithms, and Processing Hardware.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying the Frontal-to-Ceiling Domain Gap for YOLO-Based Hand Gesture Recognition in Smart Homes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Real-Time Hand Gesture Recognition in Clinical Settings: A Low-Power FMCW Radar Integrated Sensor System with Multiple Feature Fusion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hand gesture recognition (HGR) is a convenient and natural form of human-computer interaction. It is suitable for various applications. Much research has already focused on wearable device-based HGR. By contrast, this paper gives an overview focused on device-free HGR. That means we evaluate HGR systems that do not require the user to wear something like a data glove or hold a device. HGR systems are explored regarding technology, hardware, and algorithms. The interconnectedness of timing and power requirements with hardware, pre-processing algorithm, classification, and technology and how they permit more or less granularity, accuracy, and number of gestures is clearly demonstrated. Sensor modalities evaluated are WIFI, vision, radar, mobile networks, and ultrasound. The pre-processing technologies stereo vision, multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO), spectrogram, phased array, range-doppler-map, range-angle-map, doppler-angle-map, and multilateration are explored. Classification approaches with and without ML are studied. Among those with ML, assessed algorithms range from simple tree structures to transformers. All applications are evaluated taking into account their level of integration. This encompasses determining whether the application presented is suitable for edge integration, their real-time capability, whether continuous learning is implemented, which robustness was achieved, whether ML is applied, and the accuracy level. Our survey aims to provide a thorough understanding of the current state of the art in device-free HGR on edge devices and in general. Finally, on the basis of present-day challenges and opportunities in this field, we outline which further research we suggest for HGR improvement. Our goal is to promote the development of efficient and accurate gesture recognition systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.