ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Field-Based Gait Retraining to Reduce Impact Loading Using Tibial Accelerometers in High-Impact Recreational Runners: A Feasibility Study.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy of different dietary interventions for cardiopulmonary fitness at high altitude: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the feasibility of a field-based gait retraining program using real-time axial peak tibial acceleration (PTA) feedback in high-impact recreational runners and explored the effects on running biomechanics and economy. We recruited eight recreational runners with high landing impacts to undertake eight field-based sessions with real-time axial PTA feedback. Feasibility outcomes were assessed through program retention rates, retraining session adherence, and perceived difficulty of the gait retraining program. Adverse events and pain outcomes were also recorded. Running biomechanics were assessed during field and laboratory testing at baseline, following retraining, and one-month post-retraining. Running economy was evaluated during laboratory testing sessions. Seven participants completed the retraining program, with one participant withdrawing due to illness before commencing retraining. An additional participant withdrew due to a foot injury after retraining. Adherence to retraining sessions was 100%. The mean (SD) perceived difficulty of the program was 4.3/10 (2.2). Following retraining, the mean axial PTA decreased in field (-29%) and laboratory (-33%) testing. The mean instantaneous vertical loading rate (IVLR) reduced by 36% post-retraining. At one-month follow-up, the mean axial PTA remained lower for field (-24%) and laboratory (-34%) testing, and the IVLR remained 36% lower than baseline measures. Submaximal oxygen consumption increased following gait retraining (+5.6%) but reverted to baseline at one month. This feasibility study supports the use of field-based gait retraining to reduce axial PTA and vertical loading rates in recreational runners without adversely affecting the running economy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.