ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Evaluating Machine Learning-Based Soft Sensors for Effluent Quality Prediction in Wastewater Treatment Under Variable Weather Conditions.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Maintaining effluent quality in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) comes with significant challenges under variable weather conditions, where sudden changes in flow rate and increased pollutant loads can affect treatment performance. Traditional physical sensors became both expensive and susceptible to failure under extreme conditions. In this study, we evaluate the performance of soft sensors based on artificial intelligence (AI) to predict the components underlying the calculation of the effluent quality index (EQI). We thus focus our study on three ML models: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) and Transformer. Using the Benchmark Simulation Model no. 2 (BSM2) as the WWTP, we were able to obtain datasets for training the ML models and to evaluate their performance in dry weather scenarios, rainy episodes, and storm events. To improve the classification of networks according to the type of weather, we developed a Random Forest (RF)-based meta-classifier. The results indicate that for dry weather conditions the Transformer network achieved the best performance, while for rain episodes and storm scenarios the GRU was able to capture sudden variations with the highest accuracy. LSTM performed normally in stable conditions but struggled with rapid fluctuations. These results support the decision to integrate AI-based predictive models in WWTPs, highlighting the top performances of both a recurrent network (GRU) and a feed-forward network (Transformer) in obtaining effluent quality predictions under different weather conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.