Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40292765›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Damage Identification Using Measured and Simulated Guided Wave Damage Interaction Coefficients Predicted Ad Hoc by Deep Neural Networks.

Christoph Humer, Simon Höll, Martin Schagerl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christoph HumerInstitute of Structural Lightweight Design, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenbergerstr. 69, 4040 Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4607-0840
Simon HöllIndependent Researcher, Am Fuchsholz 15, 07381 Wernburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1150-8195
Martin SchagerlInstitute of Structural Lightweight Design, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenbergerstr. 69, 4040 Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6520-1677

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thin-walled structures are widely used in aeronautical and aerospace engineering due to their light weight and high structural performance. Ensuring their integrity is crucial for safety and reliability, which is why structural health monitoring (SHM) methods, such as guided wave-based techniques, have been developed to detect and characterize damage in such components. This study presents a novel damage identification procedure for guided wave-based SHM using deep neural networks (DNNs) trained with experimental data. This technique employs the so-called wave damage interaction coefficients (WDICs) as highly sensitive damage features that describe the unique scattering pattern around possible damage. The DNNs learn intricate relationships between damage characteristics, e.g., size or orientation, and corresponding WDIC patterns from only a limited number of damage cases. An experimental training data set is used, where the WDICs of a selected damage type are extracted from measurements using a scanning laser Doppler vibrometer. Surface-bonded artificial damages are selected herein for demonstration purposes. It is demonstrated that smart DNN interpolations can replicate WDIC patterns even when trained on noisy measurement data, and their generalization capabilities allow for precise predictions for damages with arbitrary properties within the range of trained damage characteristics. These WDIC predictions are readily available, i.e., ad hoc, and can be compared to measurement data from an unknown damage for damage characterization. Furthermore, the fully trained DNN allows for predicting WDICs specifically for the sensing angles requested during inspection. Additionally, an anglewise principal component analysis is proposed to efficiently reduce the feature dimensionality on average by more than 90% while accounting for the angular dependencies of the WDICs. The proposed damage identification methodology is investigated under challenging conditions using experimental data from only three sensors of a damage case not contained in the training data sets. Detailed statistical analyses indicate excellent performance and high recognition accuracy for this experimental data-based approach. This study also analyzes differences between simulated and experimental WDIC patterns. Therefore, an existing DNN trained on simulated data is also employed. The differences between the simulations and experiments affect the identification performance, and the resulting limitations of the simulation-based approach are clearly explained. This highlights the potential of the proposed experimental data-based DNN methodology for practical applications of guided wave-based SHM.

Indexed as

damage identificationdeep neural networksguided wavesmachine learningprincipal component analysisstructural health monitoringwave damage interaction coefficients

Identifiers

PMID40292765
PMCPMC11944519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.