ArticlePolymers2025
Specimen Size and Environmental Exposure Effects on Initial Diffusion in E-Glass/Vinylester Pultruded Composites.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper studies the effect of specimen size on the moisture uptake characteristics of pultruded E-glass/vinylester composites exposed to conditions of immersion and 99% RH over a range of temperatures. Four different specimen sizes representative of sizes commonly used for material characterization (tension, short-beam-shear, and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis) as well as moisture uptake are included. It is shown that both exposure conditions and geometry significantly influence uptake behavior, and that the differences, in general, can be elucidated through consideration of surface-to-edge area ratios of the specimens. For the current study, the ratio extends from 2.528 at the lowest level for the short-beam-shear specimens to 16.979 at the highest for the tensile specimens. The overall levels of uptake in the period of exposure, the levels of transition uptake, and the diffusion coefficients are noted to increase with a decrease in the ratio, suggesting an increased influence of the edge effect, which is further enhanced with an increase in temperature. Levels of normalized transition uptake for the specimens with the lowest surface-to-edge area ratio are 12.5 and 8.2 times higher than those for the specimens with the highest ratio at the two extreme temperatures, respectively, when exposed to 99% RH, and are 7.2 and 15.3 times, respectively, under conditions of immersion. Activation energy calculations also highlight differences based on specimen size and the condition of exposure with immersion leading to a lower activation energy than exposure to 99% RH when considering the initial linear regime with the specimens having the largest surface-to-edge area ratios showing 11.3-13.5% higher levels due to exposure to 99% RH, whereas the two specimens with the smaller ratios show a 4.9% increase. The findings highlight the importance of specimen size and exposure conditions and emphasize that the commonly used assumptions could lead to inaccurate results especially when extrapolated. The use of the immersion condition as a means of accelerating field conditions of humidity could significantly overestimate effects. Further, the direct use of uptake characteristics from specimens at one size, or surface-to-edge area ratio, could lead to inaccurate conclusions if extrapolated to specimens that are significantly different leading to design and durability prediction implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.