ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Vocal Emotion Perception and Musicality-Insights from EEG Decoding.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Musical ability and emotion recognition in speech prosody: The role of pitch discrimination.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- Emotion recognition from body movement through interpretable motion-aware sequential modeling.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Vocal emotion recognition: A comparison of singers and instrumentalists, amateurs and professionals.iScience · 2025Article
- Bridging Text and Speech for Emotion Understanding: An Explainable Multimodal Transformer Fusion Framework with Unified Audio-Text Attribution.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Musicians have an advantage in recognizing vocal emotions compared to non-musicians, a performance advantage often attributed to enhanced early auditory sensitivity to pitch. Yet a previous ERP study only detected group differences from 500 ms onward, suggesting that conventional ERP analyses might not be sensitive enough to detect early neural effects. To address this, we re-analyzed EEG data from 38 musicians and 39 non-musicians engaged in a vocal emotion perception task. Stimuli were generated using parameter-specific voice morphing to preserve emotional cues in either the pitch contour (F0) or timbre. By employing a neural decoding framework with a Linear Discriminant Analysis classifier, we tracked the evolution of emotion representations over time in the EEG signal. Converging with the previous ERP study, our findings reveal that musicians-but not non-musicians-exhibited significant emotion decoding between 500 and 900 ms after stimulus onset, a pattern observed for F0-Morphs only. These results suggest that musicians' superior vocal emotion recognition arises from more effective integration of pitch information during later processing stages rather than from enhanced early sensory encoding. Our study also demonstrates the potential of neural decoding approaches using EEG brain activity as a biological sensor for unraveling the temporal dynamics of voice perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.