ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Estimating Speed Error of Commercial Radar Tracking to Inform Whale-Ship Strike Mitigation Efforts.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vessel speed reduction measures are a management tool used to reduce the risk of whale-ship strikes and mitigate their impacts. Large ships and other commercial vessels are required to publicly share tracking information, including their speed, via the Automatic Identification System (AIS), which is commonly used to evaluate compliance with these measures. However, smaller vessels are not required to carry AIS and therefore are not as easily monitored. Commercial off-the-shelf marine radar is a practical solution for independently tracking these vessels, although commercial target tracking is typically a black-box process, and the accuracy of reported speed is not available in manufacturer specifications. We conducted a large-scale measurement campaign to estimate radar-reported speed error by comparing concurrent radar- and AIS-reported values. Across 3097 unique vessel tracks from ten locations, there was strong correlation between radar and AIS speed, and radar values were within 1.8 knots of AIS values 95% of the time. Smaller vessels made up a large share of the analyzed tracks, and there was no significant difference in error compared to larger vessels. The results provide error bounds around radar-reported speeds that can be applied to vessels of all sizes, which can inform vessel-speed-monitoring efforts using radar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.