Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40292690›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Deep Transfer Learning-Based Visual Inspection System for Assembly Defects in Similar Types of Manual Tool Products.

Hong-Dar Lin, Hsiang-Ling Wu, Chou-Hsien Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hong-Dar LinDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 413310, Taiwan.
Hsiang-Ling WuDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 413310, Taiwan.
Chou-Hsien LinDepartment of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-0273, USA.

Funding

National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan (R.O.C.) NSTC 112-2221-E-324-012-MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study introduces an advanced inspection system for manual tool assembly, focusing on defect detection and classification in flex-head ratchet wrenches as a modern alternative to traditional inspection methods. Using a deep learning R-CNN approach with transfer learning, specifically utilizing the AlexNet architecture, the system accurately identifies and classifies assembly defects across similar tools. This study demonstrates how a pre-trained defect detection model for older manual tool models can be efficiently adapted to new models with only moderate amounts of new samples and fine-tuning. Experimental evaluations at three assembly stations show that the AlexNet model achieves a classification accuracy of 98.67% at the station with the highest defect variety, outperforming the R-CNN model with randomly initialized weights. Even with a 40% reduction in sample size for new products, the AlexNet model maintains a classification accuracy of 98.66%. Additionally, compared to R-CNN, it improves average effectiveness by 9% and efficiency by 26% across all stations. A sensitivity analysis further reveals that the proposed method reduces training samples by 50% at 50% similarity while enhancing effectiveness by 13.06% and efficiency by 5.31%.

Indexed as

automated visual inspectiondeep learningmanual tool assemblytransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID40292690
PMCPMC11945499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.