Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40292686›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Adhesion of Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Glycated Collagen-Comparative Analysis of Dynamic and Static Conditions.

Regina Komsa-Penkova, Anika Alexandrova-Watanabe, Svetla Todinova, Violina Ivanova, Svetoslava Stoycheva, Petar Temnishki, Borislav Dimitrov, Dobromir Dimitrov, Pencho Tonchev, Galya Georgieva and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Regina Komsa-PenkovaDepartment of Biochemistry, Medical University Pleven, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-1349-9555
Anika Alexandrova-WatanabeInstitute of Mechanics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Svetla TodinovaInstitute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-7108-051X
Violina IvanovaDepartment of Biochemistry, Medical University Pleven, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria.
Svetoslava StoychevaDepartment of Biochemistry, Medical University Pleven, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria.
Petar TemnishkiDepartment of Biochemistry, Medical University Pleven, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria.
Borislav DimitrovDepartment of Biochemistry, Medical University Pleven, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria.
Dobromir DimitrovLeonardo da Vinci Center of Competence in Personalized Medicine, 3D and Telemedicine, Robotic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, 1, "St. Kl. Ochridski" Str., 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria.
Pencho TonchevLeonardo da Vinci Center of Competence in Personalized Medicine, 3D and Telemedicine, Robotic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, 1, "St. Kl. Ochridski" Str., 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-9213-748X
Galya GeorgievaDepartment of Biochemistry, Medical University Pleven, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria.
Aleksandar KukovLeonardo da Vinci Center of Competence in Personalized Medicine, 3D and Telemedicine, Robotic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, 1, "St. Kl. Ochridski" Str., 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria.
Izabela IvanovaLeonardo da Vinci Center of Competence in Personalized Medicine, 3D and Telemedicine, Robotic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, 1, "St. Kl. Ochridski" Str., 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria.
Tihomir TiankovInstitute of Mechanics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Emilia AbadjievaInstitute of Mechanics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-6610-9231
Velichka StrijkovaInstitute of Optical Materials and Technologies, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.
George AltankovLeonardo da Vinci Center of Competence in Personalized Medicine, 3D and Telemedicine, Robotic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, 1, "St. Kl. Ochridski" Str., 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria.

Funding

Financed by the Science and Education for Smart Growth Operational Program (2014-2020) and co-financed by the European Union through the European Structural and Investment funds Grant No BG05M2OP001-1.002-0011-C02Funded by the Pridst 2021-2027, co-funded by the EU "Centre of Competence in Personalized Medicine, 3d And Telemedicine, Robotic Assisted and Minimally Invasive Surgery"NextGenerationEU, through the National Recovery and Resilience Plan of the Republic of Bulgaria project N° BG-RRP-2.004-0003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) behavior on glycated collagen is crucial for advancing regenerative medicine and understanding pathological mechanisms in diseases such as diabetes, cancer, and aging. While previous research has demonstrated reduced MSC interaction with glycated collagen under static conditions due to disrupted integrin signaling, these studies did not accurately replicate the dynamic mechanical environment that MSCs encounter in vivo. Here we present a comprehensive investigation comparing adipose-derived MSC (ADMSC) behavior under both dynamic flow conditions and static adhesion, revealing unexpected temporal dynamics and challenging existing paradigms of cell-matrix interactions. Using a sophisticated microfluidic BioFlux system combined with traditional static adhesion assays, we examined ADMSC interactions with native collagen for 1-day glycated (GL1), and 5-day glycated (GL5) samples. Under flow conditions, MSCs demonstrated remarkably rapid attachment-within 3-5 min-contrasting sharply with the classical 2 h static incubation protocol. This rapid adhesion was particularly enhanced on 5-day glycated collagen, though subsequent testing revealed significantly weaker adhesion strength under shear stress compared to native collagen. Static conditions also showed a distinct pattern: increased ADMSC adhesion to glycated samples within the first 30 min, followed by a progressive decrease in adhesion and compromised cell spreading over longer periods. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis revealed significant changes in collagen surface properties upon glycation. These included a substantial reduction in the negative surface charge (from ~800 to 600 mV), altered surface roughness patterns (Rrms varying from 3.0 ± 0.4 nm in native collagen to 7.70 ± 0.6 nm in GL5), and decreased elasticity (Young's modulus dropping from 34.8 ± 5.4 MPa to 2.07 ± 0.3 MPa in GL5). These physical alterations appear to facilitate rapid initial cell attachment while potentially compromising long-term stable adhesion through traditional integrin-mediated mechanisms. This study provides novel insights into the complex dynamics of MSC adhesion to glycated collagen, revealing previously unknown temporal patterns and challenging existing models of cell-matrix interactions. The findings suggest a need for revised approaches in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, particularly in conditions where glycated collagen is prevalent.

Indexed as

AFMcell–matrix interactionsdynamic and static adhesionglycated collagenmesenchymal stem cell (MSC)

Identifiers

PMID40292686
PMCPMC11944920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.