ArticlePolymers2025
Investigation of the Effects of Different Curing Methods on the Adhesion Strength of Single-Lap Joints Produced by Bonding 3D-Printed ABS and PLA Plates with Different Epoxy Adhesives.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influence of Surface Treatments on the Pull-Off Performance of Adhesively Bonded Polylactic Acid (PLA) Specimens Manufactured by Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM).Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When bonding 3D-printed polymer products produced by the FFF method, it is essential to determine the appropriate adhesives and assess the resulting adhesion strength. This study focused on producing SLJ test specimens by bonding 3D-printed ABS and PLA plates using Araldite 2011, Araldite 2015-1, and Araldite 2021-1 adhesives. The bonding processes involved various curing methods: without oven (WO), 40 °C for 3 h, 40 °C for 16 h, 60 °C for 2 h, and 80 °C for 1 h. This study aimed to investigate the impact of different adhesives and curing conditions on the bonding strengths of the SLJ test specimens made from 3D-printed ABS and PLA plates. The results showed that the highest tensile strength and elongation at break values for both the ABS and PLA SLJs were achieved in specimens cured at 80 °C for 1 h, irrespective of the adhesive used. Specifically, the maximum tensile force values for the ABS SLJs ranged from 1386.26 N to 1743.98 N, while for the PLA SLJs, the values ranged from 2690.48 N to 3374.77 N. Additionally, the elongation at break values for the ABS SLJs varied from 2.463 mm to 3.485 mm, and for the PLA SLJs, they ranged from 3.260 mm to 4.300 mm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.