ArticlePolymers2025
Evolutionary Algorithm-Based Design and Performance Evaluation of Wood-Plastic Composite Roof Panels for Low-Cost Housing.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wood-plastic composites (WPCs) have emerged as a sustainable and cost-effective material for construction, particularly in low-cost housing solutions. However, designing WPC panels that meet structural, serviceability, and manufacturing constraints remains a challenge. This study focused on optimizing the cross-sectional shape of WPC roof panels using evolutionary algorithms to minimize material usage while ensuring compliance with deflection and stress constraints. Two evolutionary algorithms-the genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO)-were employed to optimize sinusoidal and trapezoidal panel profiles. The optimization framework integrated finite element analysis (FEA) to evaluate structural performance under uniformly distributed loads and self-weight. The modulus of elasticity of the WPC material was determined experimentally through three-point bending tests, ensuring accurate material representation in the simulations. The trapezoidal profile proved to be the most optimal, exhibiting superior deflection performance compared with the sinusoidal profile. A comparative analysis of GA and PSO revealed that PSO outperformed GA in both solution optimality and convergence speed, demonstrating its superior efficiency in navigating the design space and identifying high-performance solutions. The findings highlight the potential of WPCs in low-cost housing applications and offer insights into the selection of optimization algorithms for similar engineering design problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.