ReviewPolymers2025
Boosting Food Packaging Sustainability Through the Valorization of Agri-Food Waste and By-Products.
Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Converting Food Waste into Value-Added Products: A Review on Current Technologies, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Edible interfaces based on chitosan, cellulose, and hemicellulose: from food preservation to bioactive delivery and post-consumption relevance.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- From Food Waste to Edible Packaging: Development and Characterization of Biodegradable Gelatin Films with Microfibrillated Cellulose from Cowpea Pod Skin (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Technological Innovations and Circular Economy in the Valorization of Agri-Food By-Products: Advances, Challenges and Perspectives.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The environmental concerns associated with synthetic polymers have intensified the search for sustainable and biodegradable alternatives, particularly for food packaging applications. Natural biopolymers offer promising solutions due to their biodegradability, reduced environmental impact, and reliance on renewable resources. Among these, agri-food waste and by-products have gained significant attention as valuable feedstocks for polymer production, supporting a circular economy approach. This review critically examines the current status of biopolymers derived from plant, animal, and microbial sources, focusing on their physical and chemical properties and their application in food packaging. The findings underscore that the properties of plant- and animal-based biopolymers are heavily influenced by the source material and extraction techniques, with successful examples in biodegradable films, coatings, and composite materials. However, a critical gap remains in the characterization of microbial biopolymers, as research in this area predominantly focuses on optimizing production processes rather than evaluating their material properties. Despite this limitation, microbial biopolymers have demonstrated considerable potential in composite films and fillers. By addressing these gaps and evaluating the key factors that influence the success of biopolymer-based packaging, we contribute to the ongoing efforts to develop sustainable food packaging solutions and reduce the environmental impact of plastic waste.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.