ArticlePolymers2025
A Comprehensive Mechanical Testing of Polyacrylamide Hydrogels: The Impact of Crosslink Density.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Injectable hydrogels for bone regeneration: from materials design to clinical translation.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Multifunctional Hydrogels in Sustainable Agriculture: Structure Design, Application and Future Challenges.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Influence of Certain Operating Conditions of the FDM Process on the Mechanical Properties of Polymeric Materials-A Review.Polymers · 2026Review
- Mechanical annealing in a soft granular layer under cyclic shear at varying frequencies.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Unveiling the Compression Mechanical Properties of AMPS-APTAC-DMAAm Terpolymeric Hydrogels.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Polyacrylamide and Polyacrylamide/Polysaccharide Hydrogels for Well Water Shutoff in High-Temperature Reservoirs.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical properties are one of the most important characteristics of biomaterials for many different applications, including biomedicine. Soft biomaterials, such as hydrogels, are difficult to characterize by conventional mechanical testing, because their mechanical properties are much lower than required by conventional testing machines. In this work, we aimed to systematically study the mechanical behavior of a model soft material, polyacrylamide hydrogels, under different loading modes: tension, torsion, compression, and indentation. This allowed us to develop a comprehensive approach to the mechanical testing of soft materials. To overcome excessive compression and slippage of the hydrogel samples when fixed in the grips during tension, additional 3D-printed grips were designed. Digital image correlation was used to determine the Poisson's ratio of the hydrogels. The Young's modulus values obtained from all types of mechanical tests analyzed were highly correlated. However, for hydrogels with a low crosslinker concentration, 1-2%, tension-compression asymmetry was observed. Moreover, the results of the mechanical tests were verified in indentation tests, including analytical estimation, and full-scale and numerical experiments. We also discuss the limits of using a two-parameter Mooney-Rivlin model for fitting hydrogel uniaxial tension deformation curves, which was unstable for the hydrogels with 4 and 9% crosslinker concentration. The implemented approach provided a comprehensive analysis of the mechanical behavior of biomaterials. The elastic moduli for all hydrogels studied were in the range from 20 to 160 kPa, which corresponds well to human soft tissues, making them a promising material for application as tissue-mimicking phantoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.