ArticlePolymers2025
Machine Learning-Driven Flexural Performance Prediction and Experimental Investigation of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bar-Reinforced Concrete Beams.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive modeling and experimental validation of mechanical-microstructural relationships in 3D-printed Onyx-fibre composites.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Explainable AI-Based Analysis of Deflection in RC Beams with Longitudinal GFRP Bars in Tension Zone.Polymers · 2026Article
- An Interpretable Ensemble Machine Learning Framework for Predicting the Ultimate Flexural Capacity of BFRP-Reinforced Concrete Beams.Polymers · 2026Article
- Influence of Training-Testing Data Variation on ML-Based Deflection Prediction of GFRP-Reinforced High-Strength Concrete Beams.Polymers · 2025Article
- Data-driven framework for prediction of mechanical properties of waste glass aggregates concrete.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study experimentally examines the flexural performance, crack formation patterns, and failure mechanisms of glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bar-reinforced concrete beams with varying concrete compressive strengths (low, moderate, and high), addressing a gap in the current literature. Furthermore, it employs an innovative machine learning approach to enhance analysis. Nine RC beams reinforced with GFRP bars, having concrete compressive strengths of low (CC20), moderate (CC30), and high (CC40), each measuring 150 × 200 × 1100 mm, were fabricated and tested under three-point bending conditions. Through the integration of three-point bending tests and machine learning-based prediction models, this study connects experimental findings with advanced analytical approaches. One of the key innovations in this study is the use of eighteen ML regression models implemented with Python's PyCaret library, achieving an impressive average prediction accuracy of 91.5% for RC beam deflection values. In particular, the Ada Boost Regressor and Gradient Boosting Regressor models performed exceptionally well on GFRP bar-reinforced concrete beams, providing the highest number of consistent and highly accurate predictions, making them very useful tools for GFRP bar-reinforced beam ultimate load-carrying capacity/deflection predictions. The outcomes identified clear failure mechanisms: RC beams with CC20, CC30, and CC40 concrete compressive strengths typically developed a single, large flexural crack at the midpoint. Although the ultimate load-carrying capacity of GFRP bar RC beams improved with higher concrete compressive strength, CC20 and CC30 beams displayed more ductile failure behavior than CC40 beams. The ultimate load-carrying capacity of CC40 RC beams was determined to be approximately 74% higher than that of CC20 RC beams. Regardless of the concrete compressive strength class, the absence of shear cracks and the prevention of sudden failure under bending in GFRP bar-reinforced concrete beams are considered major advantages of using GFRP bar reinforcement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.