Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40292578›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Machine Learning-Driven Flexural Performance Prediction and Experimental Investigation of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bar-Reinforced Concrete Beams.

Muhammet Karabulut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Muhammet KarabulutDepartment of Structural Mechanics and Analysis, Technical University of Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2887-248X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study experimentally examines the flexural performance, crack formation patterns, and failure mechanisms of glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bar-reinforced concrete beams with varying concrete compressive strengths (low, moderate, and high), addressing a gap in the current literature. Furthermore, it employs an innovative machine learning approach to enhance analysis. Nine RC beams reinforced with GFRP bars, having concrete compressive strengths of low (CC20), moderate (CC30), and high (CC40), each measuring 150 × 200 × 1100 mm, were fabricated and tested under three-point bending conditions. Through the integration of three-point bending tests and machine learning-based prediction models, this study connects experimental findings with advanced analytical approaches. One of the key innovations in this study is the use of eighteen ML regression models implemented with Python's PyCaret library, achieving an impressive average prediction accuracy of 91.5% for RC beam deflection values. In particular, the Ada Boost Regressor and Gradient Boosting Regressor models performed exceptionally well on GFRP bar-reinforced concrete beams, providing the highest number of consistent and highly accurate predictions, making them very useful tools for GFRP bar-reinforced beam ultimate load-carrying capacity/deflection predictions. The outcomes identified clear failure mechanisms: RC beams with CC20, CC30, and CC40 concrete compressive strengths typically developed a single, large flexural crack at the midpoint. Although the ultimate load-carrying capacity of GFRP bar RC beams improved with higher concrete compressive strength, CC20 and CC30 beams displayed more ductile failure behavior than CC40 beams. The ultimate load-carrying capacity of CC40 RC beams was determined to be approximately 74% higher than that of CC20 RC beams. Regardless of the concrete compressive strength class, the absence of shear cracks and the prevention of sudden failure under bending in GFRP bar-reinforced concrete beams are considered major advantages of using GFRP bar reinforcement.

Indexed as

ada boost regressorbrittleductileflexural crackglass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bargradient boosting regressormachine learning (ML)reinforced concrete beamshear crackthree-point bending test

Identifiers

PMID40292578
PMCPMC11944394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.