ArticlePolymers2025
A Self-Healing Structure Based on Monolayer Wall-Less Microvascular Network Carriers for Orthotropic Anisotropic Polymer Composites.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to the anisotropic structure and mechanical properties of composite laminates, internal damage cracks can easily occur. In this study, orthotropic anisotropic glass-fiber-reinforced polymer composites were used as the repair object. Firstly, the anisotropic material was analyzed using the finite element method, the self-healing structural compliance, water head loss, and volume percentage of the microvascular network were taken as the objective functions, and the topology optimization of the microvascular network structure was carried out using non-dominated soring genetic algorithm II. Secondly, the self-healing material with a wall-less microvascular network was prepared via the vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding process and the embedded wire removal method. Finally, the light repair performance was tested using the three-point bending test. The results show that in the case of no intervention for light repair, the average maximum failure load of the self-healing structure after embedding the microvascular network can reach 94.06% of that before embedding; with the introduction of real-time light repair, the average maximum failure load of the self-healing structure with light repair was increased by 4.1% compared with the self-healing structure without light repair. Meanwhile, the second peak load of the light-repaired structure can reach 51.36% of the average maximum failure load, which is 28.56% higher than that of the non-light-repaired structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.