Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40292573›Full record

ReviewPolymers2025

Black Soldier Fly Culture as a Source of Chitin and Chitosan for Its Potential Use in Concrete: An Overview.

Hugo González-Lara, Benito Parra-Pacheco, Enrique Rico-García, Humberto Aguirre-Becerra, Ana Angélica Feregrino-Pérez, Juan Fernando García-Trejo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hugo González-LaraDivisión de Investigación y Posgrado, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Carretera a Chichimequillas Km. 1 s/n, Amazcala, El Marqués 76265, Querétaro, Mexico.ORCID 0009-0006-5728-4413
Benito Parra-PachecoDivisión de Investigación y Posgrado, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Carretera a Chichimequillas Km. 1 s/n, Amazcala, El Marqués 76265, Querétaro, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-0412-5682
Enrique Rico-GarcíaCuerpo Académico de Bioingeniería Básica y Aplicada, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Cerro de las Campanas s/n, Las Campanas, Santiago de Querétaro 76010, Querétaro, Mexico.
Humberto Aguirre-BecerraCuerpo Académico de Bioingeniería Básica y Aplicada, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Cerro de las Campanas s/n, Las Campanas, Santiago de Querétaro 76010, Querétaro, Mexico.
Ana Angélica Feregrino-PérezCuerpo Académico de Bioingeniería Básica y Aplicada, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Cerro de las Campanas s/n, Las Campanas, Santiago de Querétaro 76010, Querétaro, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8001-5912
Juan Fernando García-TrejoCuerpo Académico de Bioingeniería Básica y Aplicada, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Cerro de las Campanas s/n, Las Campanas, Santiago de Querétaro 76010, Querétaro, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chitin is one of the most abundant biopolymers in nature and is found mainly in the exoskeletons of crustaceans and insects, in the cell walls of fungi, and in some species of mollusks. Chitosan is a derivative of chitin; it is much more accessible and has a broader range of applications, including improving the quality of materials such as films, plastics, and concrete. The rheological properties of chitin and chitosan refer to their behavior against deformation and flow and their ability to resist structural changes under mechanical stress conditions. These properties are fundamental in applications where the aim is to control the texture, viscosity, and handling of these biopolymers. Three types of methods for the extraction of chitin and chitosan can be classified: the first is the chemical method, which presents high yields but uses reagents that generate toxic residues; the second is the biological method, which takes advantage of chemical reactions of microorganisms but in some cases has low yields compared to chemical extraction; and the third is the enzymatic method, which uses reagents with a low production of toxic residues. However, low extraction yields are also reported. One of the primary sources of chitin and chitosan is the residue of shellfish and crustaceans. However, a new source of obtaining these compounds is the black soldier fly, which has the same yields of biopolymers as shellfish. In addition, this is a residue of the black soldier fly larvae culture, where protein, oil, and biofertilizers are generated by the bioconversion of organic waste. This work proposes the black soldier fly as an alternative source for extracting chitin and chitosan, using organic methodologies that do not generate toxic residues and have high yields. Including these biopolymers in concrete elaboration could have positive results in terms of flexibility, compressive strength, and workability.

Indexed as

biopolymerentoconcretegreen concreteorganic wastesustainability

Identifiers

PMID40292573
PMCPMC11945844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.