ArticleInternational journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP
Cognitive training and retest learning effects on theta and alpha power in older and young adults: A perspective on the crunch hypothesis and the STAC-R model.
Article in International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to the STAC-R model, scaffolding enhancement is achievable through various interventions. Indicating forms of compensatory scaffolding, the STAC-R model refers to phenomena described in other theoretical models, such as the enhanced fronto-parietal recruitment described in the CRUNCH hypothesis. The presented study investigated whether working memory training can induce compensatory scaffolding in older adults through increased prefrontal and parietal involvement (indicated by changes in theta and alpha power). The sample comprised 90 individuals, including 45 participants from the experimental (22 older and 23 young adults) and 45 from the passive control group (21 older and 24 young adults). The age range was 60-75 years for older adults and 20-35 years for young adults. We assessed the effects of a 12-session working memory training with the use of the adaptive n-back task on theta and alpha power measured in frontal midline and central-parietal areas by EEG in older and young adults during the n-back task performance at three difficulty levels. At the behavioral level, we found a positive, significant improvement in cognitive performance in young adults from experimental group. In contrast, the positive changes in older adults were too small to prove statistically significant. At the level of neuronal activity, we observed not a training effect but a retest effect. It was revealed primarily for theta oscillations in older adults and manifested by increased theta power with higher task demands and equalization of theta power of older and younger persons in the post-test. For alpha oscillations, the retest effect was negligible, and its only manifestation observed in older adults was a reduction in the dependence of alpha power on task difficulty. The study results indicate limited potential for improving WM performance in older adults compared to young adults. The presence of the retest learning effect, instead of the training effect, proved that familiarity with the task was crucial, rather than regular training of its performance. Changes observed in older adults in theta power can be considered positive, and these results are consistent with the CRUNCH hypothesis of a compensatory role for increased executive control involvement. In turn, changes in the alpha power in the same group should be considered rather maladaptive. Nevertheless, given the overall study findings, it can be concluded that although the behavioral effects of training are stronger in young adults, the changes in neuronal activity resulting from the retest learning effect are more marked in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.