Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40292417›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025

Is percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy necessary for learning the unilateral biportal endoscopy technique?

Yiwei Xie, Yicheng Chen, Qifeng Yu, Yi Liu, Xin Gu, Xiaojian Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yiwei Xie *Department of Orthopedics, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yicheng Chen *Department of Orthopedics, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qifeng YuDepartment of Orthopedics, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yi LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xin GuDepartment of Orthopedics, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiaojian YeDepartment of Orthopedics, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate the effect of prior percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) surgical experience on the learning curve of the unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) technique. Methods: A total of 200 patients undergoing single-segment UBE surgery were enrolled. The procedures were performed by four surgeons, who were divided into two groups based on whether they had prior PELD experience (Group A: with; Group B: without). Proficiency in UBE technique was defined as a surgery time of less than 80 min. The cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM) method was used to analyze each surgeon's learning curve. Clinical efficacy was evaluated using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after surgery: Modified Macnab, VAS-leg, VAS-back, and ODI scores. Follow-up information was obtained 12 months postoperatively. Results: The number of cases required for Group A surgeons to achieve proficiency were 17 and 18, significantly fewer than the 25 and 27 cases for Group B surgeons. No significant differences in clinical outcomes were observed between the two groups. The complication rates for Group A and Group B were 5 and 14, respectively. Conclusion: Prior PELD surgical experience facilitates learning the UBE technique. This experience further aids in shortening surgical times, lowering complication rates, and decreasing the need for reoperation.

Indexed as

cumulative sum (CUSUM)learning curve analysispercutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD)surgical complicationsunilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE)

Identifiers

PMID40292417
PMCPMC12021920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.