ReviewFrontiers in surgery2025
Artificial intelligence-assisted phase recognition and skill assessment in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated surgical phase recognition in pediatric laparoscopic fundoplication using deep learning: a retrospective video-based study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Response to 'Methodological considerations on artificial intelligence-based phase recognition in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy'.BJU international · 2026Article
- Fisher duty interval and particle swarm optimization for neural architecture search.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of Its Role in Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the widespread adoption of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic surgery has been an essential component of modern surgical procedures. As key technologies, laparoscopic phase recognition and skill evaluation aim to identify different stages of the surgical process and assess surgeons' operational skills using automated methods. This, in turn, can improve the quality of surgery and the skill of surgeons. This review summarizes the progress of research in laparoscopic surgery, phase recognition, and skill evaluation. At first, the importance of laparoscopic surgery is introduced, clarifying the relationship between phase recognition, skill evaluation, and other surgical tasks. The publicly available surgical datasets for laparoscopic phase recognition tasks are then detailed. The review highlights the research methods that have exhibited superior performance in these public datasets and identifies common characteristics of these high-performing methods. Based on the insights obtained, the commonly used phase recognition research and surgical skill evaluation methods and models in this field are summarized. In addition, this study briefly outlines the standards and methods for evaluating laparoscopic surgical skills. Finally, an analysis of the difficulties researchers face and potential future development directions is presented. Moreover, this paper aims to provide valuable references for researchers, promoting further advancements in this domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.