Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40292408›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2025

Artificial intelligence-assisted phase recognition and skill assessment in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review.

Wenqiang Liao, Ying Zhu, Hanwei Zhang, Dan Wang, Lijun Zhang, Tianxiang Chen, Ru Zhou, Zi Ye

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wenqiang Liao *Department of General Surgery, RuiJin Hospital LuWan Branch, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ying Zhu *Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Hanwei ZhangInstitute of Intelligent Software, Guangzhou, China.
Dan WangHangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Lijun ZhangInstitute of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Tianxiang ChenSchool of Cyber Space and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Ru ZhouDepartment of General Surgery, RuiJin Hospital LuWan Branch, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zi YeInstitute of Intelligent Software, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the widespread adoption of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic surgery has been an essential component of modern surgical procedures. As key technologies, laparoscopic phase recognition and skill evaluation aim to identify different stages of the surgical process and assess surgeons' operational skills using automated methods. This, in turn, can improve the quality of surgery and the skill of surgeons. This review summarizes the progress of research in laparoscopic surgery, phase recognition, and skill evaluation. At first, the importance of laparoscopic surgery is introduced, clarifying the relationship between phase recognition, skill evaluation, and other surgical tasks. The publicly available surgical datasets for laparoscopic phase recognition tasks are then detailed. The review highlights the research methods that have exhibited superior performance in these public datasets and identifies common characteristics of these high-performing methods. Based on the insights obtained, the commonly used phase recognition research and surgical skill evaluation methods and models in this field are summarized. In addition, this study briefly outlines the standards and methods for evaluating laparoscopic surgical skills. Finally, an analysis of the difficulties researchers face and potential future development directions is presented. Moreover, this paper aims to provide valuable references for researchers, promoting further advancements in this domain.

Indexed as

laparoscopic surgerymethodsphase recognitionskill evaluationsurgical datasets

Identifiers

PMID40292408
PMCPMC12021839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.