ArticleInternational journal of integrated care
Developing an Integrated Service Planning Tool: Lessons Learnt from Planning the WSLHD Thoracic Oncology Program.
Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: We aim to provide practical guidelines on how to develop integrated service plans that incorporate care provided by multiple specialties. Introduction: Bringing specialties together to strategically plan future health service delivery is challenging. In Australia, collaboration between specialties is required to prepare for the introduction of the National Lung Cancer Screening Program (NLCSP). The purpose of this investigation is to provide practical guidelines on how to develop integrated service plans that incorporate care provided by multiple specialties. Description: Collaborative planning was undertaken in Western Sydney Local Health District (WSLHD) to develop a WSLHD Thoracic Oncology Program Service Plan. The planning process included oversite by a steering committee, engagement of a range of stakeholders, a series of interviews, meetings and workshops, and the documentation of the strategies and actions required to implement the plan. The planning process was analysed to produce an Integrated Service Planning Tool (ISPT). Discussion: The ISPT includes five key enablers for the planning process: foster a strong culture of collaboration; establish strategic governance; identify a patient journey framework; conduct extensive and flexible stakeholder consultation; and formalise the plan with documentation of a roadmap. Key actions for each enabler translate the ideas into activities. Conclusion: A culture of collaboration across specialties supports the development of an integrated service plan that encompasses the full patient journey. The ISPT provides a blueprint for overcoming a traditional siloed approach to service planning for diseases and conditions that require interdisciplinary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.