Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40292373›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

Minimally invasive adrenalectomy for adrenocortical cancers: A systematic review.

Faisal Masood Pirzada, Rajeev Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. What's inside.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Faisal Masood PirzadaDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rajeev KumarDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Adrenocortical cancer (ACC) is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis. Due to the widespread use of imaging, greater proportion of cases are being discovered at an early stage, and it is possible to surgically excise these tumors by minimally invasive (MIS) approaches, including pure laparoscopy and robotic assistance. However, due to the fear of capsular breach, tumor spill, and incomplete removal, open surgery (OS) is still the preferred option for managing ACC. The aim of this review is to compare the two approaches and assess where MIS can be option for the surgical management of ACC. Methods: This review was performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews statement. Studies comparing OS and MIS approaches for ACC were retrieved from the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. The two approaches were compared for tumor characteristics and outcomes. Results: A total of 22 studies comparing MIS with OS were included in this review. Out of the total 4639 patients, 1411 underwent surgery by MIS and 3228 by OS. Patients operated by MIS had smaller tumors, lower operative time and blood loss with higher positive surgical margin rate, and higher rate of local recurrence. However, the overall survival was comparable between the two approaches. Conclusions: MIS can be used in localized Stage-I ACC but only at high-volume centers. Stage II ACC may be considered for MIS if there is no evidence of local invasion and the surgery can be performed without capsular perforation and conversion to OS.

Identifiers

PMID40292373
PMCPMC12021357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.