Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40292372›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

Modification of minced buccal mucosal graft endourethral urethroplasty: A pilot study.

Abhay Singh Gaur, Vivek Tarigopula, Swarnendu Mandal, Pavithra Ayyanar, Suvendu Purkait, Kirti Singh, C Sabique, Prasant Nayak

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. What's inside.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
  4. Erratum: Modification of minced buccal mucosal graft endourethral urethroplasty: A pilot study.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abhay Singh GaurDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Vivek TarigopulaDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Swarnendu MandalDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Pavithra AyyanarDepartment of Pathology and Lab Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Suvendu PurkaitDepartment of Pathology and Lab Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Kirti SinghDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
C SabiqueDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Prasant NayakDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The minced buccal mucosal graft endourethral urethroplasty (MBGEU) is our novel technique of combining direct vision internal urethrotomy with buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty. We assessed success at 30-months of follow-up. Secondary objectives were to compare the changes in the American Urological Association (AUA) symptom score, peak flow rate (Qmax), and post-void residue (PVR) postoperatively. Methods: This pilot study (CTRI/2021/09/036651) was conducted at a tertiary-care center and included 30 male patients with primary, <2 cm bulbar urethral strictures. A 1 cm × 1 cm buccal mucosal graft was harvested, minced, centrifuged, and suspended in fibrin glue. After a cold knife urethrotomy, a 12-Fr Foley was placed. An 11-Fr cystourethroscope was passed by the side of the catheter, and the suspension was instilled through a 5-Fr ureteric catheter over the urethrotomy site. Results: The success rate of MBGEU was 93.33% at 12 months, 90% at 18 months, 83.3% at 24 months, and 76.6% at 30 months. The stricture recurred in seven patients. The AUA score reduced by 15, 15, 16, 16, 15.5, and 15.5 points from the baseline at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months (P < 0.01). There was a significant increase in the Qmax by 17 ml/s and a significant reduction in the PVR by 73.5 ml at 30 months (P < 0.01). No donor site morbidity was seen. There were no postoperative complications. Conclusion: The medium-term success of MBGEU is encouraging. However, a longer follow-up and further studies with a larger sample size and a comparative arm are required.

Identifiers

PMID40292372
PMCPMC12021355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.