Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40292362›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2025

Living Matter(s) for Learning: An International, Multi-Sited Ethnography Exploring How Surgeons' Learning Is Mediated Through the Use of Live Animal Simulation.

Cara Swain, Charlotte Silén, Klas Karlgren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cara SwainDepartment of LIME, Karolinska Institute, SE.ORCID 0000-0003-0273-9653
Charlotte SilénDepartment of LIME, Karolinska Institutet, SE.ORCID 0000-0001-7952-4808
Klas KarlgrenDepartment of LIME, Karolinska Institute, SE.ORCID 0000-0003-1255-7650

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical simulation training substituting a live animal for a human patient is a continuing practice. Despite clear ethical controversy, many perceive this type of simulation to be 'high fidelity' and therefore valuable. This study employs a sociomaterial perspective to explore how use of a live animal mediates learning activity and behaviour during a trauma surgical simulation course. Methods: This international, focused ethnography generated data through observation of surgical simulation courses in six different countries. A narrative analysis was conducted using instrument-mediated learning theory as a lens for interpretation. Results: The key finding is the dual and fluid existence of a live animal as an instrument for learning, variably perceived as a simulator tool for training and as a patient that must be saved. When framed as a tool, surgical knowledge and skills are practiced with learning acquired via epistemic and pragmatic mediation. Performing a thoracotomy denotes a critical moment; procedural unfamiliarity, evident haemorrhage and inherent risk of a deadly outcome contribute to uncertainty and clinical complexity. Learners are hence more likely to frame the animal as a patient. This experience has psychological fidelity, feeling more authentic as actions have consequences. Risk of failure to sustain the life of the animal mediates reflexive learning, teaching the learners about themselves and their abilities. Conclusion: Live animal simulation training mediates surgical learning differently, dependent on whether the animal is framed as an instrument or as a patient. The animal's ability to bleed and exsanguinate to death creates risk and uncertainty as learners perform complex skills under pressure of significant consequence. Authenticity could be amplified if the animal is framed as a patient throughout the simulated learning event.

Indexed as

LearningSimulation TrainingSurgeonsAnimalsAnthropology, CulturalClinical CompetenceHumans

Identifiers

PMID40292362
PMCPMC12023139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.