ArticleEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2025
Association between PM
Article in Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breathing carcinogens: PMJournal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Hardwood Burning as a Dominant Source of Fine Particulate Matter from Biomass Burning in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Particulate Air Pollution, Disease, and Death in the Cities and Towns of Southwestern Pennsylvania.Annals of global health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Fine particulate matter (PM Objective: To assess the relationship between annual mean PM Methodology: 2016 Aerosol Optical Depth modeled PM Results: The average ambient PM Conclusion: In Western Pennsylvania, PM
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.