ArticleAcute medicine & surgery
Multiple trauma and shock vital signs as potential for improved outcome in patients with severe head trauma.
Article in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multiple trauma and shock vital signs as potential for improved outcome in patients with severe head trauma.Acute medicine & surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the prognostic factors in severe head trauma patients (Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) ≤ 8) with all trauma, including those with trunk injury as well as single severe head trauma (abbreviated injury scale (AIS) ≥ 3). Methods: We included 152 consecutive patients with head trauma (AIS ≥ 3) and consciousness disorders (GCS ≤ 8) who were transported to our institute from January 2017 to October 2022. Data on the patients' background, vital signs at presentation, multiple trauma (AIS ≥ 3 in two or more locations), surgical intervention, and hematological findings were examined; a retrospective analysis was conducted with the modified Rankin Scale score after 3 months assigned as the primary outcome. Results: The patients' mean age was 57.6 ± 23.4 years (0-89), 49 patients (32.2%) had multiple trauma, and 25 patients (16.4%) had accompanying shock vital signs. In the multivariate analysis of prognosis, age ( Conclusion: Advanced age and high D-dimer levels are important independent associated factors in patients with severe consciousness disorder associated with head trauma; meanwhile, the prognosis is more favorable in patients whose consciousness disorders are associated with multiple trauma or circulatory failure, indicating that rapid improvement of circulatory failure may lead to better outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.