Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40292350›Full record

ReviewAJOG global reports2025

Circadian rhythm disruption and polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tara Heydari, Prakash V A K Ramdass

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AJOG global reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tara HeydariDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (Heydari, and Ramdass), School of Medicine, St. George's University, St. George's, Grenada.
Prakash V A K RamdassDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine (Heydari, and Ramdass), School of Medicine, St. George's University, St. George's, Grenada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine if circadian rhythm disruption (CRD) is associated with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Our objective was to pool the overall mean differences in biomarkers of CRD (including melatonin levels, morning and evening cortisol levels, and sleep efficiency) between PCOS patients and controls. We hypothesized that CRD will be more prominent in patients with PCOS. Data sources: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, ClinicalTrials.Gov, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted from inception until 2024 using the following MeSH terms "circadian rhythm" OR "sleep disturbance" OR "melatonin" AND "polycystic ovary syndrome." Citation search supplemented the systematic database search. Study eligibility criteria: Inclusion criteria were women with PCOS, original case-control, cross-sectional, and cohort studies that identify parameters of CRD (melatonin, cortisol, and sleep disturbance). Exclusion criteria were women with endocrine and metabolic co-morbidities, menopausal women, case reports, review studies, animal studies, abstracts, and conference presentations. There was no time restriction for year of publication. Study appraisal and synthesis methods: Two investigators (T.H. and P.R.) assessed the quality of the studies included using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Forest plots were created using the Open Meta Analyst software. Publication bias was assessed in Egger's and Begg's tests. Results: A total of 16 studies were included in the systematic review and 12 studies were included in the meta-analysis (N=1,100 women [531 PCOS patients and 569 controls]). Pooled analysis showed that the mean difference in melatonin levels between PCOS patients and controls was 14.294 pg/mL, 95% CI [6.895, 21.693]. The overall mean difference in morning and evening cortisol between PCOS patients and controls was 1.103 pg/mL, 95% CI [-1.058, 3.265], and 3.574 pg/mL, 95% CI [1.741, 5.407], respectively. Pooled difference in mean sleep efficiency scores between PCOS patients and controls was -4.059, 95% CI [-6.752, -1.366]. Risk of bias assessment showed that NOS scores ranged from 7 to 9. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis provides evidence that circadian rhythm disruption is positively associated with polycystic ovary syndrome. This is substantiated by differences in parameters indicative of circadian rhythm disruption, including melatonin levels, evening cortisol, and sleep efficiency.

Indexed as

circadian rhythm disruptioncortisolmelatoninpolycystic ovary syndromesleep quality

Identifiers

PMID40292350
PMCPMC12032313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.