ArticleiScience2025
Evolutionary learning in neural networks by heterosynaptic plasticity.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Training biophysical neuron models provides insights into brain circuits' organization and problem-solving capabilities. Traditional training methods like backpropagation face challenges with complex models due to instability and gradient issues. We explore evolutionary algorithms (EAs) combined with heterosynaptic plasticity as a gradient-free alternative. Our EA models agents with distinct neuron information routes, evaluated via alternating gating, and guided by dopamine-driven plasticity. This model draws inspiration from various biological mechanisms, such as dopamine function, dendritic spine meta-plasticity, memory replay, and cooperative synaptic plasticity within dendritic neighborhoods. Neural networks trained with this model recapitulate brain-like dynamics during cognition. Our method effectively trains spiking and analog neural networks in both feedforward and recurrent architectures, it also achieves performance in tasks like MNIST classification and Atari games comparable to gradient-based methods. Overall, this research extends training approaches for biophysical neuron models, offering a robust alternative to traditional algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.