Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40292309›Full record

ReviewiScience2025

Participatory science in urban soil research: A framework for overcoming challenges and expanding public engagement.

Anna A Paltseva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anna A PaltsevaDepartments of Agronomy and Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban soils play a crucial role in supporting city sustainability, including green infrastructure, food production, water regulation, and climate resilience. Yet their complexity, compounded by environmental risks, pose challenges for research and policy. This article presents a participatory science framework that engages communities in soil monitoring and management through co-designed projects, educational outreach, and simplified data collection protocols. By integrating digital tools and real-time mapping, the framework enhances data accuracy while fostering environmental stewardship. Grounded in interdisciplinary collaboration, the framework connects scientific research, technological support, community engagement, and policy advocacy to improve urban soil health. Demonstrated through case studies and practical strategies, this approach builds capacity for sustained community involvement and equitable environmental decision-making. The broader significance lies in the framework's ability to foster reciprocal relationships between scientists and communities, where shared knowledge, action, and responsibility strengthen urban soil stewardship.

Indexed as

Earth sciencesEducationResearch methodology social sciencesSocial sciencesSoil science

Identifiers

PMID40292309
PMCPMC12032906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.