ArticleAvicenna journal of phytomedicine
The effect of wet cupping on reactive airway dysfunction syndrome (RADS) caused by early exposure to chlorine gas: A randomized clinical trial.
Article in Avicenna journal of phytomedicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In the absence of targeted antidotes for chlorine gas poisoning, a common yet concerning problem, this study investigates the effect of Wet Cupping Therapy (WCT, or " Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled trial enrolled 24 patients experiencing acute inhalation of chlorine poisoning in Tehran, Iran (2020-2021). Patients were randomly divided into control (n=12, receiving conventional treatment) and intervention (n=12, receiving conventional treatment plus WCT) groups. Signs and symptoms were assessed pre-intervention, and in the first hour, first week, and first month post-intervention. Results: Medical records of 24 patients, including 3(12.5%) men and 21(87.5%) women, with a mean age of 42.92 years old, were evaluated. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. WCT significantly improved symptoms (dyspnea, cough, chest tightness, etc.) within the first hour (p=0.003) compared to the controls, with no future significant changes during the first week and first-month post-WCT. Comparison between the groups revealed substantial differences in the following variables: dyspnea scale (p=0.009), respiratory rate (p=0.026), cough (p=0.001), breath shortness (p=0.006), chest tightness (p=0.002), chest pain (p=0.010), substernal burning (p=0.015), throat sore (p=0.005) and hoarseness (p=0.027). Peak flow meter readings, reflecting lung function, were also significantly higher in the WCT group at all time-points (p<0.007). Conclusion: WCT may offer a rapid and sustained improvement in pulmonary and respiratory symptoms following acute chlorine inhalation injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.