Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40292220›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025

Fecal microbiota transplantation alleviates lipopolysaccharide-induced osteoporosis by modulating gut microbiota and long non-coding RNA

Pengcheng Ma, Ruoyi Wang, Huizhi Chen, Jiachun Zheng, Weijie Yang, Bo Meng, Yifan Liu, Yao Lu, Jing Zhao, Hongwei Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pengcheng MaShandong Public Health Clinical Center, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Ruoyi WangShandong Public Health Clinical Center, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Huizhi ChenShandong Public Health Clinical Center, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Jiachun ZhengShandong Public Health Clinical Center, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Weijie YangShandong Public Health Clinical Center, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Bo MengShandong Public Health Clinical Center, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yifan LiuShandong Public Health Clinical Center, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yao LuShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Cells and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Qingdao, China.
Jing Zhao *Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Cells and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Qingdao, China.
Hongwei Gao *Shandong Public Health Clinical Center, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To study whether fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) can alleviate lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced osteoporosis (OP) by regulating the composition and abundance of gut microbiota and the expression level of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) Methods: Twenty C57BL/6 mice were selected. Two mice were randomly designated as fecal donors, while the remaining mice were randomly divided into control group, LPS group, and LPS + FMT group. Each group consisted of 6 mice. The mice in the LPS and LPS + FMT groups were intraperitoneally injected with LPS to establish the OP model, and the mice in the LPS + FMT group were treated with donor feces by gavage. Micro-CT was used to scan the femur specimens of mice, and the bone structural parameters of the control and LPS groups were compared to verify the effectiveness of the OP model. HE staining was used to compare the microstructure of femurs in the 3 groups. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to analyze the composition and abundance of gut microbiota in mice. Immunofluorescence staining was used to compare the expression levels of Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) in the femur of the 3 groups. Real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to compare the expression levels of lncRNA Results: Micro-CT showed that compared with the control group, the mice in the LPS group had more bone loss. The bone mineral density, trabecular number, and trabecular thickness of the control group was higher, and the trabecular separation was smaller. The models were validated effectively. HE staining showed that compared with the control group, the bone trabeculae in the LPS group were thinner and sparse, while that in the LPS + FMT group were dense and clear. The 16s rRNA sequencing showed that the abundance of Bacteroides and Lactobacillus in LPS+FMT group was significantly higher than that in LPS group. Immunofluorescence staining showed that the RUNX2 level in the control group and LPS + FMT group was similar, and both were higher than that in the LPS group. The qRT-PCR results showed that the Conclusion: FMT can enhance osteoblast levels and improve bone structure by modulating the abundance of gut microbiota in OP mice (such as increasing Bacteroides and Lactobacillus populations) and promoting the expression of lncRNA

Indexed as

Fecal Microbiota TransplantationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLipopolysaccharidesOsteoporosisRNA, Long NoncodingAnimalsCore Binding Factor Alpha 1 SubunitDisease Models, AnimalFemurMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRNA, Ribosomal, 16SX-Ray MicrotomographyCore Binding Factor Alpha 1 SubunitLipopolysaccharideslong non-coding RNA TUG1, mouseRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRunx2 protein, mousefecal microbiota transplantationgut microbiotalipopolysaccharideslncRNAosteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID40292220
PMCPMC12021831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.