ArticleMethodsX2025
Enhanced electrocardiogram classification using Gramian angular field transformation with multi-lead analysis and segmentation techniques.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional manual or feature-based ECG analysis methods are limited by time inefficiencies and human error. This study explores the potential of transforming 1D signals into 2D Gramian Angular Field (GAF) images for improved classification of four ECG categories: Atrial Fibrillation (AFib), Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH), Right Ventricular Hypertrophy (RVH), and Normal ECG.•The study employed GAF transformations to convert 1D ECG signals into 2D representations at three resolutions: 5000 × 5000, 512 × 512, and 256 × 256 pixels.•Segmentation methods were applied to enhance feature localization.•The ConvNext deep learning model, optimized for image classification, was used to evaluate the transformed ECG images, with performance assessed through accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics.The 512 × 512 resolution achieved the optimal balance between computational efficiency and accuracy. F1-score for AFib, LVH, RVH and Normal ECG were 0.781, 0.71, 0.521 and 0.792 respectively. Segmentation methods improved classification performance, especially in detecting conditions like LVH and RVH. The 5000 × 5000 resolution offered the highest accuracy but was computationally intensive, whereas the 256 × 256 resolution showed reduced accuracy due to loss details.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.