ArticleJournal of craniovertebral junction & spine
A novel approach to identifying C2 and C3 block vertebrae.
Article in Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Congenital block vertebrae (BV) is a common condition resulting from segmentation disorders during embryonic development, leading to the fusion of adjacent vertebrae. BV at C2-C3 (cervical vertebrae 2 Methods: This retrospective study compared C2 vertebral heights between two groups: 50 patients with normal cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 30 patients with congenital fusion at the C2-C3 levels. Using T2-weighted midsagittal MRI images, the height of the C2 vertebra was measured from the tip of the odontoid process to the posteroinferior part of the vertebra. Data analysis was performed using independent t-tests to evaluate the differences in measurements. Results: The mean C2 vertebral height for the normal cervical spine group was 33.22 mm, while the congenital fusion group exhibited a significantly higher mean height of 45.59 mm. These findings were statistically significant, indicating that a C2 vertebral height exceeding 33 mm is atypical in normal individuals. Our proposed threshold measurement aids in distinguishing between single vertebrae and BV. Conclusion: Our study provides a novel method for assessing C2 vertebral body height to aid in the numbering of cervical spine to enhance diagnostic accuracy in particular in patients with congenital anomalies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.