Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40292042›Full record

ReviewJHLT open2025

Cryoanalgesia in Lung Transplantation - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Felipe S Passos, Pedro B Bregion, Rachid E Oliveira, Thierry Siemeni, Ricardo E Treml, Bernardo M Pessoa, Hristo Kirov, Torsten Doenst, Shaf Keshavjee, Tulio Caldonazo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JHLT open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Felipe S PassosDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, INCAR Hospital, Santo Antônio de Jesus, Brazil.
Pedro B BregionState University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rachid E OliveiraDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.
Thierry SiemeniDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Ricardo E TremlDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, California.
Bernardo M PessoaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Hristo KirovDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Torsten DoenstDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Shaf KeshavjeeDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto Lung Transplant Program, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Tulio CaldonazoDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lung transplantation is a crucial treatment for end-stage lung diseases. However, postoperative pain management remains a significant challenge. Therefore, this study aims to examine the implications of adoption cryoanalgesia on lung transplantation pain control protocol. Methods: Three databases were searched for studies comparing cryoanalgesia versus standard of care analgesia in patients after lung transplantation. The primary outcome was opioid consumption throughout the entire hospitalization, at postoperative day (POD) 7 and at POD 14 addressed with Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME). The secondary outcomes were maximum reported pain score at POD 7, hospital length of stay (LOS) and time until extubation. Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous outcomes. Results: A total of 5 studies encompassing 485 patients undergoing lung transplantation were included, of whom 228 underwent cryoanalgesia. Compared to standard of care, cryoanalgesia demonstrated significant reduction in opioid consumption at POD 7 (MD: -96.79 MME, 95% CI -183.40 to -10.18, p=0.03), at POD 14 (MD -225,26 MME; 95% CI -366.58 to -83.94; p<0.01) and throughout the entire hospitalization (MD: -307.76 MME, 95% CI -461.72 to -153.79, p<0.01). In addition, there was a significant reduction in pain scores in the cryoanalgesia group (MD: -1.10 points, 95% CI -1.77 to -0.43, p<0.01). However, no significant differences were found regarding hospital LOS or time until extubation. Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicates that cryoanalgesia effectively reduces opioid requirements and pain levels in lung transplant patients.

Indexed as

CryoanalgesiaEpidural analgesiaLung transplantationStandard of care analgesia

Identifiers

PMID40292042
PMCPMC12022505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.