ReviewJHLT open2025
Cryoanalgesia in Lung Transplantation - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Review in JHLT open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Intercostal Nerve Cryoablation Therapy in Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery for Postoperative Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison between cryoanalgesia, epidural anaesthesia and erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia after minimally-invasive anatomic lung resection: a randomized controlled trial.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Parallel-bar versus cross-bar configurations in the Nuss procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung transplantation is a crucial treatment for end-stage lung diseases. However, postoperative pain management remains a significant challenge. Therefore, this study aims to examine the implications of adoption cryoanalgesia on lung transplantation pain control protocol. Methods: Three databases were searched for studies comparing cryoanalgesia versus standard of care analgesia in patients after lung transplantation. The primary outcome was opioid consumption throughout the entire hospitalization, at postoperative day (POD) 7 and at POD 14 addressed with Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME). The secondary outcomes were maximum reported pain score at POD 7, hospital length of stay (LOS) and time until extubation. Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous outcomes. Results: A total of 5 studies encompassing 485 patients undergoing lung transplantation were included, of whom 228 underwent cryoanalgesia. Compared to standard of care, cryoanalgesia demonstrated significant reduction in opioid consumption at POD 7 (MD: -96.79 MME, 95% CI -183.40 to -10.18, p=0.03), at POD 14 (MD -225,26 MME; 95% CI -366.58 to -83.94; p<0.01) and throughout the entire hospitalization (MD: -307.76 MME, 95% CI -461.72 to -153.79, p<0.01). In addition, there was a significant reduction in pain scores in the cryoanalgesia group (MD: -1.10 points, 95% CI -1.77 to -0.43, p<0.01). However, no significant differences were found regarding hospital LOS or time until extubation. Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicates that cryoanalgesia effectively reduces opioid requirements and pain levels in lung transplant patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.