Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40292025›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Neuromorphic algorithms for brain implants: a review.

Wiktoria Agata Pawlak, Newton Howard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Ferroelectric nanodot reservoir for neuromorphic computing.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wiktoria Agata Pawlakni2o, Washington, DC, United States.
Newton Howardni2o, Washington, DC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromorphic computing technologies are about to change modern computing, yet most work thus far has emphasized hardware development. This review focuses on the latest progress in algorithmic advances specifically for potential use in brain implants. We discuss current algorithms and emerging neurocomputational models that, when implemented on neuromorphic hardware, could match or surpass traditional methods in efficiency. Our aim is to inspire the creation and deployment of models that not only enhance computational performance for implants but also serve broader fields like medical diagnostics and robotics inspiring next generations of neural implants.

Indexed as

biohybrid interfacesbrain-computer interfaces (BCIs)brain implantsdata compressionmixed-signal designneurocomputational modelsneuromorphic computingspiking neural networks (SNNs)

Identifiers

PMID40292025
PMCPMC12021827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.