Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40292007›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2025

Overview of detection methods of fetomaternal haemorrhage.

Xinyang Li, Changfei Li, Tiemei Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xinyang Li *Department of Blood Transfusion, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Changfei Li *Patient Service Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Tiemei Liu *Department of Blood Transfusion, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fetomaternal haemorrhage is the same immunity that occurs when foetal and maternal blood are incompatible. It is critical to accurately quantify maternal haemorrhaging in order to prevent hemolytic disease in the infant. At this time, the rosette test and K-B test are the most frequently used techniques for detecting foetal red blood cells in the mother's blood. However, the sensitivity of the rosette test is low, and due to its complex operation and high subjectivity, the K-B test cannot be used as a routine clinical detection method. This review therefore focuses primarily on the clinical landscape and future prospects of methods for detecting fetomaternal haemorrhage. In a general sense, this may bring to light the most promising strategy and encourage the development of technology for fetomaternal haemorrhage in order to guarantee the early detection and prevention of hemolytic disease in newborns.

Indexed as

detection methodfetal hemoglobinfetomaternal haemorrhage (FMH)flow cytometryhemolytic disease in newborns (HDN)

Identifiers

PMID40292007
PMCPMC12021815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.