Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40291992›Full record

ArticleRadiology advances2025

Improving radiologist detection of meniscal abnormality on undersampled, deep learning reconstructed knee MRI.

Natalia Konovalova, Aniket Tolpadi, Felix Liu, Zehra Akkaya, Johanna Luitjens, Felix Gassert, Paula Giesler, Rupsa Bhattacharjee, Misung Han, Emma Bahroos and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Natalia KonovalovaRadiology and Biomedical Imaging Department, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5937-0194
Aniket TolpadiRadiology and Biomedical Imaging Department, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Felix LiuRadiology and Biomedical Imaging Department, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Zehra AkkayaRadiology and Biomedical Imaging Department, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6483-3381
Johanna LuitjensRadiology and Biomedical Imaging Department, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Felix GassertRadiology and Biomedical Imaging Department, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Paula GieslerRadiology and Biomedical Imaging Department, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Rupsa BhattacharjeeRadiology and Biomedical Imaging Department, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Misung HanRadiology and Biomedical Imaging Department, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Emma BahroosRadiology and Biomedical Imaging Department, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Sharmila MajumdarRadiology and Biomedical Imaging Department, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0201-871X
Valentina PedoiaRadiology and Biomedical Imaging Department, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Funding

Ultra-Fast Knee MRI with Deep LearningR01AR078762 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MAJUMDAR, SHARMILA · 2021 to 2025
$2.8M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR078762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate interpretation of meniscal anomalies on knee MRI is critical for diagnosis and treatment planning, with artificial intelligence emerging as a promising tool to support and enhance this process through automated anomaly detection. Purpose: To evaluate the impact of an artificial intelligence (AI) anomaly detection assistant on radiologists' interpretation of meniscal anomalies in undersampled, deep learning (DL)-reconstructed knee MRI and assess the relationship between reconstruction quality metrics and anomaly detection performance. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 947 knee MRI examinations; 51 were excluded for poor image quality, leaving 896 participants (mean age, 44.7 ± 15.3 years; 472 women). Using 8-fold undersampled data, DL-based reconstructed images were generated. An object detection model was trained on original, fully sampled images and evaluated on 1 original and 14 DL-reconstructed test sets to identify meniscal lesions. Standard reconstruction metrics (normalized root mean square error, peak signal-to-noise ratio, and structural similarity index) and anomaly detection metrics (mean average precision, F1 score) were quantified and compared. Two radiologists independently reviewed a stratified sample of 50 examinations unassisted and assisted with AI-predicted anomaly boxes. McNemar's test evaluated differences in diagnostic performance; Cohen's kappa assessed interrater agreement. Results: On the original images, the anomaly detection model achieved the following: 70.53% precision, 72.17% recall, 63.09% mAP, and a 71.34% F1 score. Comparing performance among the undersampled reconstruction datasets, box-based reconstruction metrics showed better correlation with detection performance than traditional image-based metrics (mAP to box-based SSIM, Conclusion: AI-assisted meniscal anomaly detection enhanced radiologists' interpretation of undersampled, DL-reconstructed knee MRI. Anomaly detection may serve as a complementary tool alongside other reconstruction metrics to assess the preservation of clinically important features in reconstructed images, warranting further investigation.

Indexed as

AI-assisted radiologyanomaly detectiondeep learning reconstructionimage qualityknee MRImeniscal anomalies

Identifiers

PMID40291992
PMCPMC12021832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.