ReviewJournal of medicine and life2025
Vascular injuries and complications in anterior lumbar interbody fusion: an up-to-date review.
Review in Journal of medicine and life, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- L5/S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion: anatomical and technical considerations.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vascular injuries during anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) are reported in the existing literature with an incidence rate ranging from 1% to 24%, predominantly venous lacerations owing to branch vessel avulsions during mobilization and retraction. Arterial injuries, although less frequent, occur at an incidence of 0.45% to 1.5% and are mainly characterized by thromboses; aortic lacerations remain exceptionally rare. L4-L5 and L5-S1 are the two levels associated with the majority of vascular complications. Preoperative 3D CT angiography is paramount and a gold standard, as it illustrates the anatomic variations of the iliolumbar vein, the aorta, and the vena cava bifurcation, providing the surgeon with valuable information regarding operative trajectories. Regarding preventive measures, venous laceration, the most common vascular injury, occurs less frequently when employing nonthreaded interbody grafts such as iliac crest autograft or femoral ring allograft. Also, left iliac artery thrombosis can be decreased intraoperatively by intermittent release of retraction. Managing vascular complications includes compression for bleeding control, Trendeleburg positioning of the patient and venorrhaphy, and the employment of topical clot-forming enhancement and/or hemostatic agents. Although postoperative lower limb duplex ultrasonography can be an effective tool, magnetic resonance venography (MRV) and intravenous catheterization (IVC) remain the gold standards for diagnosing postoperative pelvic vein thrombosis in cases of iliac vein repair after anterior spine surgery. This paper aimed to highlight the incidence of major vascular injury during ALIF surgery, describe predisposing risk factors, and discuss management techniques while highlighting the requirement for more sensitive and factor-specific studies to attain a more profound understanding of the mechanism of vasculature complications during ALIF procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.